The NCAA’s May 27 withdrawal deadline came and went with few surprises, as college prospects made their final decisions on whether to enter the 2026 NBA draft.
In the 10-day decision period that followed the end of the combine, 14 NBA prospects on our top 100 ultimately chose to go back to school, adding to a large wave of players opting to try again in 2027, the vast majority of whom will be well-compensated by Division I programs next season.
NBA teams expected this trend all season because of the way NIL has impacted the draft process. Nearly every player who wasn’t viewed by teams as a consensus first-round pick decided to return to college, adding to an earlier wave of prospects who opted not to test the waters at all. These players will all look ahead to what NBA teams view as a very flat 2027 draft class, one that presently lacks obvious high-end, star-level prospects and leaves plenty of room for returners to stabilize or improve their standing a year from now.
Although the very top of the board remains largely unchanged, with our top 25 prospects all remaining in the draft, there’s plenty of movement all over the top 100, based on new information coming out of the draft combine and other factors as we enter June.
The NBA’s draft withdrawal date is June 13, a final deadline that primarily applies to international prospects.
Here are ESPN’s updated rankings for the 2026 draft class, including the latest intel for the top 25 prospects. This process is informed by my own player evaluation and intel from around the NBA and college ranks, and it offers a representation of the available player pool and insight into executives’ and scouts’ views.
Quick links:
2026 mock draft | More draft coverage
Freshman | Height: 6-9 | Age: 19.3 | Previous ranking: 1
Dybantsa has more than made his case as a No. 1 pick candidate over the past six months, with strong combine measurements reaffirming his excellent physical traits for a scoring wing. Whether he hears his name called by Washington at No. 1 or lands with Utah at No. 2 (a scenario that would likely thrill both parties), he’ll enter the NBA as a potential franchise-level talent thanks to the strides he has made as an all-around offensive player.
There are still several key areas for improvement for Dybantsa in the long term, particularly his 3-point shooting, ballhandling and level of defensive engagement. Although he’s not a two-way player yet, wings with his caliber of tools and competitive makeup tend to become positive defenders over time. It helps that those weaknesses are all actionable areas for development for whichever team drafts him.
It’s worth emphasizing that Dybantsa has never been the true consensus No. 1 pick in this class, with Darryn Peterson and Cameron Boozer also garnering strong support around the league, and Caleb Wilson also considered to be in that tier by some. But NBA executives have widely come to view him as the safest choice of that group.
Freshman | Height: 6-6 | Age: 19.4 | Previous ranking: 2
Even amid the weirdness of his season at Kansas, it was a difficult call to drop Peterson to No. 2 on my board after seeing several of his best moments in person over the past year or so. He measured well at the combine and seemed to pass the interview test for teams, with the general understanding that he’s an introverted personality but his individual care factor shouldn’t be under scrutiny.
Based on current information, it would be surprising to see Peterson fall out of the top two, with both Washington and Utah presenting strong long-term fits. He’s the most gifted scorer and shotmaker in the class, with room to improve as an on-ball creator, something NBA teams will recall he did plenty of in high school. At his best, no player in the draft can match his scoring prowess, and those moments were loud but infrequent at Kansas.
Peterson’s game-changing ability to make tough shots in flow and sustain hot streaks is extremely rare, a skill that should set him apart from day one. The NBA playoffs are frequently about shot creation when the game grinds down, and Peterson has that quality. The lingering question is primarily how to help him get to that level every night.
Freshman | Height: 6-9 | Age: 18.9 | Previous ranking: 3
Boozer hasn’t moved from this spot all season and has plenty of proponents around the NBA who would make the argument for him at No. 1. He has left very little in doubt to this point in his career and might be the most NBA-ready player in the class, while still being 18 years old. Boozer led college basketball with a 17.1 box plus-minus score, shot 39.1% from 3, cleaned up player of the year awards and would have a more straightforward argument at No. 1 in many other draft years.
Although Boozer measured and tested well enough at the combine to ease some concerns around his size and mobility, it’s the lack of verticality in his game that has been the holdup for many NBA executives projecting out. He’ll never be an explosive finisher or shot blocker and will optimally be paired with a taller center who provides those things. However, there’s little debate about the strength of his skill set and his capability to impact an NBA floor right away with his impeccable decision-making, passing, physicality and leadership traits. Much of his value will come on the perimeter, not with his back to the basket.
The lottery ultimately lined up well for Boozer, who will draw looks at No. 1 and No. 2 and should feel good about the potential fits with the Memphis Grizzlies and Chicago. Rival teams view the Grizzlies as his most likely landing spot due to how well he fits that franchise’s values and needs. There remains debate in NBA circles as to where his development ultimately tops out relative to Dybantsa, Peterson and Wilson, but there’s little doubt Boozer will continue finding ways to produce and win.
Freshman | Height: 6-10 | Age: 19.9 | Previous ranking: 4
Wilson earned his place in the draft’s top four this season, with plenty of NBA evaluators rating him higher than this on their personal boards. He might still wind up fourth in that order, with Dybantsa, Peterson and Boozer boasting stronger bodies of work — but he offers significant upside as he continues to tap into his ability.
The upgraded motor Wilson brought with him to North Carolina elevated his profile as a prospect, creating a strong production profile to pair with his explosive highlight-reel moments. It will take time for him to develop into an offensive focal point and positive defender, but he makes for an excellent bet on tools and can make an impact with his energy right away. It’s hard to see Wilson falling out of the top four, with the Chicago Bulls looking like a soft landing spot and strong fit if the top of the draft goes as many around the NBA expect.
Freshman | Height: 6-6 | Age: 19.3 | Previous ranking: 5
Wagler’s positional size, versatility and unique trajectory have continued to set him apart as a prospect worth investing in, with teams including the LA Clippers and Brooklyn Nets closely studying his case at No. 5 and No. 6 and his draft range unlikely to stretch far beyond those teams.
Although Wagler doesn’t have elite burst or explosion, his uncanny ability to process the floor and knack for changing speeds and attacking angles give him real upside as a tall on-ball playmaker, an archetype that’s not easy to find and differentiates him from the other lottery guards. He shoots well enough to play either guard spot and has the size and intangibles to improve defensively over time.
Helping lead an elite Illinois offense to a Final Four berth with relatively minimal high-level basketball under his belt coming into his freshman year stands as quite an achievement. As a late-blooming, well-rounded and quick-thinking player on an obvious growth trajectory, it’s hard not to see Wagler becoming a long-term backcourt fixture, with upside to grow into more than that as he gains strength and experience.
Freshman | Height: 6-3 | Age: 19.5 | Previous ranking: 6
Acuff was helped by his combine measurements, which helped solidify his size as adequate for a ball handler in a class where he’s far from the only small guard. He was arguably the best point guard in college basketball and has elevated his stock as such. Teams view Acuff’s range as relatively narrow, with his best-available case beginning with the Clippers at No. 5 and Nets at No. 6, and the Sacramento Kings at No. 7 considered by many to be his floor.
His ability to score at all three levels and increased willingness to involve teammates have greatly boosted his profile as a player potentially worthy of shouldering heavy responsibility and driving good offense. Acuff impressively limited turnovers (2.2 per game) while handling a 29.5% usage rate and shooting 44% from 3.
Nobody in the NBA expects Acuff to be a positive defender at this point, but whatever improvement he’s capable of could go a long way, with the challenge of constructing the right defensive framework considered a caveat with selecting him.
1:32
Arkansas freshman guard Darius Acuff Jr. declares for 2026 NBA draft
Freshman | Height: 6-5 | Age: 20.2 | Previous ranking: 9
Brown measured and tested well in Chicago and appeared fully healthy at his pro day workout, helping assuage concerns around the back injury that limited him at Louisville. He was medically cleared by the NBA this week, worked out for Utah on Wednesday, and plans to visit the Bulls and Clippers, among others, with interest from guard-needy teams further down in the lottery.
There is an opportunity for Brown to climb the board with strong workouts, with his positional size, shotmaking and passing vision all strong calling cards that could separate him from the other freshman guards. Brown began the season viewed by teams as a potential top-five pick and can remind teams of his talent in these settings.
Most around the NBA expect Brown to outperform his 34% 3-point clip, particularly with the likelihood that his shot selection and consistency improve over time. While Brown has the size and shooting ability to eventually add value off the ball, he’s most comfortable with it in his hands and would be maximized with heavy on-ball reps out of the gate.
1:22
Mikel Brown Jr. scores career-high 45 points in Louisville’s blowout win
Freshman | Height: 6-4 | Age: 19.4 | Previous ranking: 7
Flemings wasn’t helped by his combine measurements (6-2½ barefoot with a plus-1-inch wingspan), recording the shortest wingspan among projected first-round guards, something that makes him more of a true one-position player in the long run than a prospect with combo potential. He still has plenty of fans around the NBA thanks to his speed, explosive burst to the rim and commitment on the defensive end.
Though his mechanics aren’t textbook, he has continued to flash enough shooting growth to excite teams long term, drawing consideration from teams inside the top 10 after a breakout freshman season, with his range starting at No. 5 with the Clippers. Scouts expect his game to continue to grow offensively, particularly in a more wide-open NBA context.
Teams have also raved about Flemings in interviews, with the intangible piece likely to help his case in a guard-heavy lottery.
Freshman | Height: 6-10 | Age: 19.5 | Previous ranking: 8
Ament had some of the best wing measurements at the combine, with outstanding size for a perimeter player at 6-9½ barefoot with a 6-11½ wingspan. His inconsistent play and struggles with physicality have been polarizing for NBA teams, but the scarcity of skilled players with his dimensions makes him worth a long look in the lottery.
Although Ament often left scouts wanting more this season, his comfort with the ball, fluidity at his size and flashes of shotmaking fit a valuable archetype and give him a strong developmental base.
He continues to draw looks throughout the lottery, with the Nets and Milwaukee Bucks viewed as possible destinations — two teams that could afford him time and minutes to develop immediately. Finding the right fit will be imperative for his long-term growth.
Junior | Height: 7-3 | Age: 21.1 | Previous ranking: 13
Mara’s massive combine measurements helped to validate his unique profile, with no shortage of lottery interest coming out of Chicago. He will be among the tallest players in the NBA from the get-go, entering the league at a time when size and skill remain at a premium.
While Mara’s skill set has always been compelling from an NBA standpoint, he took his game to another level in February and March, helped by the freedom Michigan played with as well as his own improved conditioning. There are few 7-footers on the planet with his ability to read the floor, deliver pinpoint passes, finish efficiently and wall off the rim, making him an outlier-type prospect on several levels. Some scouts also think he will become a passable jump shooter, although the statistical case for that happening isn’t especially strong.
Rival teams consider him to be in play as high as No. 6 for Brooklyn, with the Hawks, Warriors and Thunder also viewed as potential landing spots in the lottery. Landing with a team that wants to lean into his playmaking skills will give him the best chance to maximize his impact.
Freshman | Height: 6-4 | Age: 20.7 | Previous ranking: 10
Burries is drawing looks all over the lottery, with interest starting as high as the Clippers at No. 5. If history serves, the fact that he’s the oldest freshman in the class might ultimately push him down the board a little, with teams tending to strongly factor for youth early in the draft.
He recorded average dimensions for a 2-guard at the combine, coming in at 6-3¾ barefoot with a 6-6 wingspan and 215 pounds, making him better suited as a bigger-bodied combo. Teams feel he’ll need to improve his comfort level playing on the ball to maximize his NBA impact in that type of role.
Although there’s variance of opinion around his ultimate ceiling, Burries does have room to expand his game offensively as well as a solid role-player floor due to his willingness to rebound and guard.
Senior | Height: 6-9 | Age: 23.7 | Previous ranking: 12
Lendeborg is expected to come off the board somewhere in the back half of the lottery, having answered the majority of questions teams previously had with his excellent season. Although he is essentially ancient for a first-round pick, he offers an extremely rare level of versatility as a player with legitimate center-sized dimensions who is comfortable on the perimeter and can guard all five positions in a pinch.
Although the age factor suggests Lendeborg is likely a high-end role player at best, his unusual late-blooming trajectory and emergence at Michigan with added on-court freedom make him a unique case study. Players like him tend to be particularly valuable in a playoff context, enabling a team to keep size on the floor defensively while playing four or five out on the other end.
The Dallas Mavericks, Warriors and Thunder stand out as interesting landing spots for Lendeborg from both a fit and need perspective, with his skill set immediately strengthening all three teams.
13. Karim Lopez, SF/PF, New Zealand Breakers
Height: 6-9 | Age: 19.1 | Previous ranking: 11
Lopez is drawing interest from a number of teams in the lottery, including the Clippers, Nets, Bucks and Warriors, with rival teams viewing him as more of a trade-back candidate later on in the case of the Clippers and Nets.
He was helped by his combine measurements, affirming his size to play both forward positions capably and massive hands. He continues to improve and has positioned himself as an intriguing development bet coming off a strong second season in the NBL
Many teams are intrigued by Lopez’s mix of size, skill and toughness but want to see him improve as a shooter and get a better sense of how well he can create offense for himself. These are things he can display in workouts as he gets in front of teams in the coming weeks to help firm up his position.
4:12
Karim López, Mexico’s top hoops prospect, is on the road to the NBA
Sophomore | Height: 6-9 | Age: 20.3 | Previous ranking: 24
Johnson was another winner at the combine, measuring in at 6-9 barefoot with a plus-6.5-inch wingspan, numbers that legitimize his size as a smaller center. He showcased great mobility in testing and looked more comfortable than expected shooting the ball from long range in drills.
His defensive versatility and instrumental role in Michigan’s championship earned him significant attention from NBA teams down the stretch, with his interest now beginning in the late lottery and with teams anticipating he won’t make it out of the teens.
His style of play is unflashy and might not expand much offensively in the long term, but Johnson has an NBA-ready role profile and is still just 20 years old. He offers immediate depth appeal for playoff teams and will be in the mix for almost every team considering a big in his range.
Freshman | Height: 6-11 | Age: 20.1 | Previous ranking: 14
Steinbach’s measurements helped him at the combine, coming in at 6-10¼ barefoot with a plus-4-inch wingspan and 9-foot standing reach. Although he’s not a prolific shot blocker, those numbers give him legitimate dimensions at center, helping to address some teams’ questions as to whether he’d profile as undersized for the position.
Arguably the best rebounder in the draft, Steinbach continues to draw looks in the 10-to-20 range from every team in need of help up front. His basketball instincts, physical coordination and understanding of his own role give him a bankable floor as a dependable rotation player. Though not a dynamic scorer, Steinbach does offer floor-spacing potential, making 34% of his 3s this season.
Sophomore | Height: 6-4 | Age: 20.5 | Previous ranking: 15
Philon has drawn interest from teams starting in the late lottery, but it remains to be seen whether he can leap ahead of any of the younger guards over the course of the next few weeks. His athletic testing and measurements fell in line with his 2025 combine data, with decent size but below-average testing numbers for a ball handler.
His tight handle and ability to create off the bounce and score in spurts are still strong selling points, although many around the league feel he projects better as a sixth-man-type creative guard. Coming off an outstanding season at Alabama, Philon should provide an offensive spark wherever he lands.
Philon is drawing interest from teams in the lottery including Dallas and Milwaukee at the high end, but there are also scenarios where he falls into the teens because of the sheer number of guards on the board.
1:13
Labaron Philon Jr. highlights vs. Tennessee Volunteers
Freshman | Height: 6-9 | Age: 19.8 | Previous ranking: 25
Graves completed his surprise one-and-done trajectory by deciding to stay in the draft this week, with teams intrigued by his strong analytic profile and curious to keep learning more about him over the next month.
Although there is still a difference of opinion on Graves’ upside around the league, with some evaluators concerned about his average physical profile and lack of production sample against high-level competition, his strong feel for winning basketball is evident on film and has helped to back up what the numbers indicate.
Graves is drawing interest as high as the late lottery and appears to be trending toward a top-20 selection, an impressive rise for a player who redshirted his first year of college and entered the season on the fringes of the NBA’s radar.
Sophomore | Height: 6-3 | Age: 20.2 | Previous ranking: 17
Anderson officially opted to stay in the draft this week, feeling comfortable with his position inside the top 20 following early feedback from the workout circuit. The combine was largely positive for him, after he surprisingly posted the highest max vertical among point guards and unsurprisingly shot the ball well in drills.
He won NBA teams over this season with his stellar shooting (41.5% from 3) and ball-screen operation, building on what he’d previously shown while stepping into an expanded playmaking role.
On the other hand, Anderson measured at just 6-1 barefoot in Chicago, putting him on the small end of the spectrum for his position, something that could push him down the board a bit as teams continue evaluating the other guards. He continues to battle with Labaron Philon Jr. and Bennett Stirtz for position in this range, with teams including the Charlotte Hornets and Toronto Raptors among those looking at guards.
Senior | Height: 6-4 | Age: 22.7 | Previous ranking: 21
Stirtz was one of the top shooters at the combine and continues to garner looks from teams all over the top 20, including Charlotte, Memphis and Toronto.
Although it remains unclear in which order the point guards will go outside the lottery, Stirtz appears to be on good footing as a rotation-ready guard who is adept at using screens and also provides real gravity as a shooter. He carried as large a load for his team as any player in college basketball last season, but he has the type of skill set that should effectively scale down alongside better talent.
How teams view his age relative to the others at his position in this tier of the draft appears to be the key question, giving Stirtz an opportunity to force the issue and move up the board with positive workouts.
Sophomore | Height: 6-5 | Age: 21.5 | Previous ranking: 22
Carr was arguably the biggest winner of the combine, catching fire during his only scrimmage and showcasing his tantalizing combination of explosiveness and shotmaking ability. His 30 points and six made 3s were one of the top individual scrimmage performances in combine history, giving him momentum heading into June.
With a 42-inch max vertical and plus-8¼-inch wingspan, Carr has some of the best athletic gifts in the class and should continue to benefit from the lack of scoring-oriented wings available. Some teams still have questions about his limited playmaking ability and inconsistent defense, factors that might cap what type of role he ultimately grows into.
Still, there is always interest in wings with his type of profile, making him a consideration for essentially every team looking for shooting in the 10-to-20 range.
0:17
Cameron Carr hits the trey vs. Arizona State Sun Devils
Freshman | Height: 6-11 | Age: 19.3 | Previous ranking: 16
Cenac measured well at the combine and likely helped himself simply by showing up; his combination of solid positional size, length and above-average mobility is one that typically rises in the predraft process.
The number of bigs who have made strong cases in the 14-to-20 range means Cenac will have work to do behind the scenes, as he is viewed as more of a project than some of the alternatives in this part of the draft. While his inconsistent production at Houston has made him somewhat polarizing for teams, his projectable frame, improved rebounding and fluid shooting mechanics check several important boxes for a modern center.
His realistic landing spots start at No. 14 with Charlotte and Chicago at No. 15 — teams in need of a long-term center. However, the variability in this part of the draft, with several teams holding multiple picks, means Cenac’s range runs into the early 20s.
Sophomore | Height: 6-10 | Age: 18.9 | Previous ranking: 18
Quaintance began the season viewed as a lottery-level talent and continues to draw looks all over the first round, with teams holding varying levels of concern around his medical status at this point in the process.
Now more than a year removed from ACL surgery and turning 19 in July, Quaintance has remained firmly in the discussion thanks to his terrific defensive potential. He has a strong frame and good shot-blocking instincts that were readily evident during his freshman year at Arizona State, film teams will continue to look back at due to his lack of games at Kentucky. He measured well at the combine but didn’t participate in athletic testing and looked healthy at his pro day, but teams noted that he appeared to avoid landing on his previously injured leg.
Teams are continuing to do their work on Quaintance going into the draft, with his long-term upside likely to keep him in the first-round mix as things stand. But it remains to be seen how many of the questions he’ll be able to answer on the predraft circuit. His range looks particularly wide at the moment, with other bigs emerging as strong candidates in the top 20.
Junior | Height: 6-8 | Age: 20.9 | Previous ranking: 23
Swain continues to receive looks in the mid-to-late first round on the strength of his breakout season at Texas. Although he didn’t play particularly well at the combine, his measurables, ability to get downhill and defensive versatility have kept him in the first-round mix.
Perimeter shooting remains the biggest question for Swain as the primary hole in an otherwise well-rounded profile for an NBA wing. But there are plenty of teams in the back half of the first round looking to get more athletic on the perimeter who will consider him.
Sophomore | Height: 6-6 | Age: 20.5 | Previous ranking: 19
It didn’t come as much of a surprise that Evans opted to stay in the draft, and he offers a straightforward NBA profile as a talented perimeter shotmaker with good size and room to improve defensively.
Evans measured 6-5½ barefoot at the combine, giving him excellent size for a 2-guard although he weighed in at just 186 pounds. His below-average strength and foot speed might cap his upside somewhat, but his ability to shoot off movement will likely play up and give him a pathway to a role. He appears to be safely in the first round at this point.
Freshman | Height: 6-8 | Age: 19.4 | Previous ranking: 20
Peat announced Wednesday that he will remain in the draft, placing his stock somewhat in flux going into June. There was concern around the league regarding Peat’s altered shooting mechanics at the combine and at his pro day, with his lack of a reliable jump shot considered the primary swing skill that could hold him back from NBA success.
The winning history, defensive versatility and physicality Peat provides will still garner first-round interest. The impact of the shooting concerns on his projection will continue to make him more fit specific from team to team. Landing somewhere with an optimal plan for his role development could make a difference, and he’ll need to make some inroads on the workout circuit to help firm up a first-round landing spot from here.
Remaining big board for the 2026 class
26. Meleek Thomas, SG/PG, Arkansas | Age: 19.8
27. Ebuka Okorie, PG, Stanford | Age: 19.1
28. Henri Veesaar, C, North Carolina | Age: 22.2
29. Zuby Ejiofor, PF/C, St. John’s | Age: 22.1
30. Alex Karaban, SF/PF, UConn | Age: 23.5
31. Joshua Jefferson, SF/PF, Iowa State | Age: 22.5
32. Luigi Suigo, C, Mega Basket | Age: 19.3
33. Tarris Reed Jr., C, UConn | Age: 22.8
34. Sergio de Larrea, PG/SG, Valencia | Age: 20.5
35. Ryan Conwell, SG, Louisville | Age: 21.9
36. Baba Miller, PF/C, Cincinnati | Age: 22.3
37. Jack Kayil, PG/SG, Alba Berlin | Age: 20.3
38. Braden Smith, PG, Purdue | Age: 22.8
39. Jaden Bradley , PG, Arizona | Age: 22.7
40. Trevon Brazile, PF/C, Arkansas | Age: 23.4
41. Richie Saunders, SG/SF, BYU | Age: 24.7
42. Dillon Mitchell, PF, St. John’s | Age: 22.7
43. Ugonna Onyenso, C, Virginia | Age: 22.1
44. Ja’Kobi Gillespie, PG, Tennessee | Age: 22.2
45. Emanuel Sharp, SG, Houston | Age: 22.2
46. Felix Okpara, C, Tennessee | Age: 22.1
47. Izaiyah Nelson, PF/C, South Florida | Age: 22.7
48. Bryce Hopkins, SF/PF, St. John’s | Age: 23.7
49. Tobe Awaka, PF, Arizona | Age: 22.3
50. Tyler Nickel, SG, Vanderbilt | Age: 22.7
51. Tobi Lawal, PF, Virginia Tech | Age: 23.1
52. Bruce Thornton, PG, Ohio State | Age: 22.7
53. Nick Martinelli, SF/PF, Northwestern | Age: 22.1
54. Maliq Brown, PF/C, Duke | Age: 22.5
55. Kylan Boswell, PG/SG, Illinois | Age: 21.1
56. Tyler Bilodeau, PF, UCLA | Age: 22.1
57. Otega Oweh, SG/SF, Kentucky | Age: 22.9
58. Milos Uzan, PG, Houston | Age: 23.4
59. Noam Yaacov, PG, Oostende | Age: 21.6
60. Vsevolod Ishchenko, SG/SF, Lokomotiv Kuban | Age: 21.3
61. Nate Bittle, C, Oregon | Age: 23
62. Oscar Cluff, C, Purdue | Age: 24.5
63. Keyshawn Hall, SF, Auburn | Age: 23.1
64. Darrion Williams, SF, NC State | Age: 23.1
65. Graham Ike, PF, Gonzaga | Age: 23.8
66. Trey Kaufman-Renn, PF/C, Purdue | Age: 23.8
67. Malique Lewis, SF, Southeast Melbourne | Age: 21.5
68. Pavle Backo, C, OKK Beograd | Age: 18.9
69. Tamin Lipsey, PG, Iowa State | Age: 22.9
70. Michael Ajayi, SF, Butler | Age: 22.9
71. Quadir Copeland, PG, NC State | Age: 22.7
72. Jaden Henley, SG, Grand Canyon | Age: 22.1
73. Rafael Castro , C, George Washington | Age: 23.2
74. Jaron Pierre Jr., SG, SMU | Age: 23.9
75. Aaron Nkrumah, SG, Tennessee State | Age: 24.2
76. Tre Donaldson, PG, Miami | Age: 22.5
77. Nick Boyd, PG/SG, Wisconsin | Age: 25.1
78. Seth Trimble, PG/SG, North Carolina | Age: 21.8
79. Mark Mitchell, PF, Missouri | Age: 22.7
80. Malik Reneau, PF, Miami | Age: 23.2
81. Ernest Udeh Jr., C, Miami | Age: 22.4
82. Elijah Mahi, SG, Santa Clara | Age: 22.7
83. Duke Miles, PG/SG, Vanderbilt | Age: 24.3
84. Jaxon Kohler, C, Michigan State | Age: 22.9
85. Jalen Washington, PF/C, Vanderbilt | Age: 22.3
86. Lamar Wilkerson, SG, Indiana | Age: 24.5
87. Tucker DeVries, SG/SF, Indiana | Age: 23.5
88. Tre Carroll, SF, Xavier | Age: 23.1
89. Isaac McKneely, SG, Louisville | Age: 22.5
90. Melvin Council Jr., PG/SG, Kansas | Age: 24.1
91. Cade Tyson, SG/SF, Minnesota | Age: 22.8
92. William Kyle III, PF, Syracuse | Age: 22.2
93. Peter Suder, PG/SG, Miami (Ohio) | Age: 22.8
94. Donovan Atwell, SG, Texas Tech | Age: 22.8
95. Josh Dix, SG, Creighton | Age: 21.9
96. Fletcher Loyer, SG, Purdue | Age: 22.7
97. Lajae Jones, SG/SF, Florida State | Age: 22
98. Xaivian Lee, PG/SG, Florida | Age: 22.2
99. Jaylin Sellers, SG, Providence | Age: 23
100. Kashie Natt, SG, Sam Houston | Age: 23.3
