Researchers have developed organoids that can regenerate like the endometrium, the lining of the uterus that sheds and re-forms during the menstrual cycle. The team used the miniature 3D structures to simulate rarely seen repair processes, which could inform future therapeutic strategies for tissue renewal and wound healing. The findings were published in Cell Stem Cell on 28 April.
The endometrium has a unique ability to repair itself after menstrual shedding without scarring, but how it does this is a mystery. Until this study, it had been difficult to replicate the activity in the laboratory and studying it in people is too invasive, says co-author Konstantina Nikolakopoulou, a molecular biologist who did the research while at the Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research in Basel, Switzerland.
“It is fantastic to have a model system that you can do experiments on,” says Deena Emera, an evolutionary biologist at the Buck Institute for Research on Aging in Novato, California. Insights about endometrium repair will not only help scientists to improve understanding of gynaecological diseases such as endometriosis, but also could be relevant to regeneration research in other tissues.
On supporting science journalism
If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Lab-grown tissue
Nikolakopoulou’s organoids were developed on the basis of models that her former supervisor created in 2017. For those models, the researchers took a biopsy from a person’s endometrium, separated the cell types and mixed only the epithelial cells — the main tissue type in the endometrium — with a gelatinous membrane. This enabled the cells to self-organize into a hollow, spherical structure that acted like the endometrium.
Nikolakopoulou and her team took the model to the next level by emulating the menstrual cycle in its cells. First, they treated the organoids with oestrogen and progesterone, hormones that signal the transition of menstrual phases. The team then withdrew the hormones, which happens naturally at this point in the cycle owing to activity in the ovaries. In people, the reduction of progesterone causes shedding of the endometrium, or menstruation. The type of cells that trigger shedding was not present in the organoid, which meant that the team had to mechanically break down the tissue with a pipette to simulate degeneration. They then watched as it regenerated, just like in a human endometrium.
Nikolakopoulou says the organoids are simple and contain only epithelial cells rather than an entire microenvironment of various cell types, such as immune, stromal and endothelial cells, and components such as oxygen and blood. It’s best to first understand how to “break down the puzzle, and then start increasing complexity,” she says.
Luminal helpers
Past research in primates has suggested that deep-tissue stem cells are responsible for the renewal of the endometrium.
But when Nikolakopoulou and her colleagues analysed the tissue that the organoids shed, they saw that luminal cells, another type of epithelial cell, were involved. Located at the surface of the endometrium, these cells help embryos to implant in the endometrium before pregnancy.
The team also found that the luminal cells expressed a gene called WNT7A, which is known to support tissue regeneration in primates.
Intrigued by the presence of WNT7A, the researchers cloned the organoids and used gene editing to remove it. They found that the clones’ growth and survival potential were compromised compared with the original organoids.
When they looked at some of the few endometrium samples that they have from people, they also detected the presence of luminal cells and expression of WNT7A before the endometrium reforms, supporting their role in regeneration.
Future directions for organoid development should be to increase the complexity represented in the uterine microenvironment, Nikolakopoulou says. Emera agrees that more-advanced organoid models with a greater diversity of cell types could imitate the tissue-breakdown process more accurately than the team’s mechanical method.
This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on May 1, 2026.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can’t-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world’s best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.
